Apollo.io Pricing 2026: what’s really included in each plan

When you're evaluating tools to scale outbound sales, one of the most common names that pops up is Apollo.io. And sooner or later, you're going to ask the obvious question: how does Apollo pricing actually work?

The platform uses a hybrid pricing model: a fixed monthly fee per user combined with usage-based credits.

These credits are consumed when you search contacts, reveal mobile numbers, or export data. Sounds simple, but the real cost often depends on how intensively your team uses the tool.

On paper, it seems affordable.
In practice, the final invoice might look very different.

In the sections below, we’ll break down each pricing tier, highlight hidden costs, and help you decide whether Apollo fits your workflow or not.

What is Apollo and what does it offer?

Apollo.io is a B2B sales intelligence and engagement platform designed to help teams find leads, connect with them, and automate outreach. It combines a lead database, email automation, and analytics tools into a single interface.

At its core, Apollo gives sales teams access to millions of contacts across industries, along with tools to reach out via email, social media, or phone. These actions are supported by filters, engagement sequences, and performance tracking.

But while it offers a broad range of features, the real utility of Apollo depends on how much you're willing to pay, and how many credits you plan to consume each month.

For many teams, Apollo is a fast way to find contacts and run email sequences; its value depends on credit consumption and whether your motion requires multichannel sales automation beyond email.

How much does Apollo cost?

Apollo uses a pricing model that blends monthly user fees with consumable credits. Each plan includes a fixed number of contact reveals, mobile numbers, and exports. If you exceed those limits, you'll need to buy additional credits, which can add up quickly.

Understanding what’s included (and what’s not) is key to avoiding surprise costs at the end of the billing cycle.

1. Apollo pricing plans: what’s included

Apollo offers four main tiers: Free, Basic, Professional, and Organization.

The Free plan includes 50 AI credits, basic contact access, and up to 2 sequences.

The Basic plan (from $49/month) adds 1,000 email credits, 75 mobile credits, and CRM integrations.

Professional (from $79/month) increases limits and adds A/B testing, advanced automation, and a dialer.

The Organization plan (from $119/month, min. 3 seats) adds SSO, custom reporting, and API access, with the highest data limits.

Each plan includes email outreach and social media integration, but usage restrictions vary sharply.

2. Feature limitations by tier

While lower-tier plans might seem cost-effective, they're heavily restricted.

For example, mobile number reveals are capped, and you can quickly run through your quota if your team is prospecting at scale.

Outreach tools are also limited: A/B testing, auto-dialing, multichannel automation, and advanced analytics are only available in Professional and Organization tiers.

If your sales motion depends on consistent multichannel prospecting, these limits may force you to upgrade, or pay for extra credits.

3. Is there a free plan or trial?

Yes, Apollo offers a free forever plan, but it's mostly useful for individual users or small teams just starting out.

The plan includes limited access to contact data, no mobile numbers, and strict caps on sequences and integrations. It's a good way to test the interface, but not realistic for daily prospecting in most B2B teams.

There’s no free trial for premium tiers, so you'll need to upgrade and pay upfront to explore full features.

4. When Apollo becomes too expensive

Apollo becomes costly when your team starts using it at volume.

Revealing mobile numbers, exporting contacts, or building daily outreach sequences can burn through credits fast, especially in multi-rep environments.

And since credits don’t roll over, you either use them or lose them each month.
If your team scales or your targeting changes frequently, budgeting becomes unpredictable.

This is where many users begin to look for alternatives: platforms that offer deeper automation, unified prospecting across email and social media, and better integration with CRMs, without the constant credit juggling.

If you’re comparing newer AI SDR-style platforms in parallel, this overview including the 11x alternatives options is a useful benchmark for how different tools handle automation depth, workflow ownership, and real-world scalability.

For startups that have recently closed a funding series (A, B or beyond), predictability in tooling costs becomes critical.

Credit overages and per-rep limits can distort budgets right when teams are scaling headcount and pipeline, so it’s worth stress-testing pricing against your expected outreach volume before committing to a contract.

Pricing updates and product changes impacting Apollo users in January 2026

By the end of 2025 and moving into January 2026, the most relevant changes around Apollo are not headline price increases, but how pricing mechanics and usage rules have quietly evolved. For teams evaluating real costs, these updates now have a direct impact on budget control, forecasting, and ROI.

The biggest shift is the consolidation of Apollo’s new credit system. Apollo now clearly distinguishes between legacy accounts and accounts migrated to the new pricing model.

Under this system, more actions consume credits than many teams initially expect, including data enrichment steps, exports, and AI-powered research features. Because the rollout has not been fully simultaneous, two companies on the same plan may experience very different limits and costs depending on when their account was migrated.

A critical clarification introduced in late 2025 is credit expiration. Credits are strictly tied to the billing cycle and do not roll over. Any unused credits disappear at the end of the month, while excess usage triggers automatic overages.

This is no longer an implied limitation or user complaint, it is explicitly stated in Apollo’s contractual terms. For finance and RevOps teams, this means Apollo requires active monthly monitoring, not passive subscription management.

Another important update concerns waterfall enrichment behavior. Apollo documents that contact enrichment may query multiple data sources sequentially until valid data is found. Credit consumption depends on which source ultimately provides the information. In practice, this introduces cost variability driven by ICP quality, geography, and industry coverage. Teams prospecting in markets with weaker data coverage typically burn more credits per usable contact.

Throughout 2025, Apollo also expanded its AI-driven features, especially around research, personalization, and workflow automation.

New AI-assisted research inside account-based workflows aims to surface context automatically for qualified accounts. While this improves productivity, it also encourages higher platform usage, which indirectly increases credit consumption. Teams adopting AI features at scale should reflect this in quarterly forecasts, not just seat pricing.

There are also quieter product changes that influence total cost of ownership. Apollo now supports file attachments and richer record-level data within contacts, accounts, and deals, with limits tied to plan tiers. This increases platform stickiness but can push teams toward higher plans if Apollo evolves from a prospecting tool into a central operational system.

Compliance and privacy have also become more operationally relevant. Apollo maintains updated documentation around GDPR, sub-processors, and data handling. For EU-based teams, this affects internal processes such as opt-out handling, data deletion requests, and CRM synchronization. While not a visible line item on the invoice, weak compliance workflows can generate hidden costs through rework, legal reviews, or data inconsistencies.

The key takeaway for January 2026 is clear. Apollo pricing should be evaluated as a usage-governed system, not a flat SaaS subscription. The monthly seat fee is only the entry point.

‍Actual spend is driven by credit governance, enrichment strategy, AI feature adoption, and operational discipline.

Teams that treat Apollo as a controlled, intent-driven prospecting layer tend to maintain predictable costs. Teams that use it as a high-volume lead factory often experience budget volatility. In 2026, understanding these mechanics is no longer optional, it is essential for scaling outbound without losing financial control.

Why companies are exploring alternatives to Apollo

Many sales teams begin with Apollo.io, but as they scale, certain gaps become impossible to ignore. Modern B2B prospecting is no longer about email alone, it’s about creating seamless, multichannel workflows that adapt to your pipeline’s real needs.

Gaps in multichannel capabilities

Apollo provides tools for email outreach and some social media automation, but the experience is often fragmented — a classic case of data fragmentation.
Managing true multichannel prospecting, where email, social media, phone, and even chat are combined in a single flow, can quickly become complex.

Teams may find themselves switching between platforms or building awkward workarounds, losing the efficiency they set out to gain.

Limited CRM and workflow sync

Sales platforms work best when they integrate directly with your existing CRM and daily workflows.

Apollo does offer basic CRM integration, but many users report that it lacks deep, real-time sync for lead status, activity logging, or customer relationship management (CRM) functionality.

This means duplicate work, missed follow-ups, and sometimes, outdated information in the CRM, a real obstacle for data-driven teams.

A stronger solution should also provide seamless data enrichment to keep lead profiles accurate and actionable in real time.

Scalability and user experience issues

As teams grow, Apollo’s credit-based system can become a bottleneck.

Every new rep increases costs, and larger teams risk running out of mobile or export credits, causing disruption just when momentum is needed most.

The platform’s user interface can also feel overwhelming, especially when managing high-volume, multichannel campaigns.

Better value offered by other tools

Many new platforms now offer more flexible pricing, deeper automation, and smoother multichannel integration.

The best solutions automate repetitive work, centralize data, and connect natively with major CRMs, helping sales teams stay productive without forcing tool changes or manual processes.

Companies making the switch are looking for a platform that saves them time, increases productivity, and brings together all channels into a single, easy-to-manage pipeline.

For these organizations, the search is about more than cost, it’s about removing friction and unlocking smarter growth.

Exploring new business opportunities in sales tech often starts with identifying platforms that match changing prospecting habits.

As teams reassess their tech stack, many also explore how different platforms compare in terms of usability, scalability, and multichannel support.

For organizations evaluating broader options beyond traditional sales engagement tools, this overview of Bitrix24 alternatives offers a helpful look at how modern solutions approach workflow consolidation, automation depth, and long-term efficiency.

What to look for in an Apollo alternative

Choosing the right sales platform means going beyond surface features.

Teams need tools that not only reach leads but also make the entire sales workflow simpler, faster, and more predictable.

Seamless multichannel prospecting in one platform

A true alternative should let you handle email, social media, phone, and other channels in a single, unified workflow.

Multichannel capabilities are key to maximizing response rates and staying relevant with prospects.

Look for a solution where you can launch, track, and optimize all your outreach in one place, without toggling between disconnected tools.

Built-in AI to automate outreach and follow-up

AI-powered automation can dramatically boost productivity for sales teams.

Platforms that automate repetitive tasks, like qualifying leads, sending follow-ups, or personalizing messages, free up your team to focus on high-value activities. For practical guidance, see this overview of AI tools for lead generation.

The right tool uses AI to analyze lead behavior, prioritize outreach, and recommend the next best action across all channels.

CRM and sales tool integrations

Seamless integration with your existing CRM and sales stack is essential.

The ideal solution should connect directly with your CRM, allowing you to centralize data, sync contacts, and automate updates.

This not only eliminates manual work but also makes onboarding easy, since you don’t have to replace your current systems.

Transparent pricing and flexible plans

Hidden fees and usage-based credit systems can make long-term budgeting a challenge.

Prioritize platforms with transparent, flexible pricing that scales with your team and usage, so you always know what to expect on your bill.

The best options offer plans that adapt to your needs, whether you’re a solo rep or a growing enterprise, without locking you into unnecessary features or unpredictable costs.

Ultimately, a great Apollo alternative empowers sales teams to be more productive, unify their prospecting efforts, and save time, all with clear pricing and seamless integration into their existing workflow.

Apollo vs. modern sales engagement platforms

Comparing Apollo with today’s best sales engagement platforms reveals important differences in how they help teams work, connect, and grow.

To choose the right solution, it’s essential to look at more than just price, features, transparency, and support all play a role.

Features and functionality

Apollo provides access to a large lead database and offers multichannel outreach, primarily through email, social media, and some phone capabilities.

However, many modern platforms take multichannel further, unifying email, social media, phone, and even chat into one fully automated workflow.

These tools often include built-in AI for data enrichment, lead scoring, and follow-up automation, enabling teams to automate repetitive tasks and save hours every week.

What stands out most in new platforms is the ability to centralize all prospecting channels, making it easier for sales teams to make decisions based on real-time, unified data rather than piecing together insights from different sources.

Pricing transparency

Apollo’s hybrid pricing model, combining monthly fees with credits, can make it tough to estimate total costs, especially as your team or outreach volume grows. For a clearer comparison of subscription structures and transparency, you can check ZoomInfo pricing to see how modern sales intelligence platforms approach cost predictability.

Modern platforms are moving toward transparent, all-inclusive pricing, allowing companies to scale without worrying about unpredictable charges or credit overages.

Having clear, flexible plans helps teams budget with confidence and avoid surprises as usage increases.

This makes it easier to focus on growth, not on managing quotas or watching the meter.

Customer support and onboarding

A great sales engagement platform isn’t just about features, it’s about how quickly your team can adopt and benefit from it.

While Apollo offers standard onboarding, many newer platforms invest heavily in personalized customer support, step-by-step onboarding, and ongoing training.

This support is crucial for fast-moving sales teams that want to minimize downtime and start seeing results quickly.

Easy integration with existing CRMs also ensures a smooth transition, so teams can leverage their current data and processes without disruption.

In summary, while Apollo remains a popular choice, today’s top sales engagement platforms deliver a stronger combination of multichannel automation, transparent pricing, and hands-on support, helping sales teams unlock more value with less friction.

‍

Understanding the Real Cost of Apollo.io in 2026

When teams first look at Apollo.io’s pricing, it appears simple — $49, $79, or $119 per user per month, depending on the plan. 

But in reality, this is just the visible part of a much bigger cost structure. 

The true total cost of ownership (TCO) goes far beyond the subscription price. It involves credits, data quality, deliverability infrastructure, and operational time — all of which have a huge impact on how much you actually spend each quarter.

The hybrid pricing trap: why credits make budgets unpredictable

Apollo’s hybrid pricing model — fixed seat fee + usage-based credits — sounds flexible, but in practice, it often leads to budget volatility. Credits are consumed every time your team reveals a contact, accesses a mobile number, or exports data.

That may seem manageable at first, but here’s the catch:

• Credits don’t roll over. If you don’t use them, they disappear.
  
  
  

• Overages are charged automatically. When your team exceeds its quota, Apollo adds credits at premium rates.
  
  
  

• Usage varies wildly. During product launches, events, or end-of-quarter pushes, credit burn can double overnight.
  
  
  

This means that a plan that looked affordable on paper can easily balloon into an unpredictable expense. 

The best teams counter this by forecasting quarterly, not monthly, and by negotiating for shared credit pools or credit rollovers during contract renewal.

To build predictability, it’s smart to allocate an additional 10–20% “usage buffer” in your sales budget. 

That gives you flexibility during high-activity periods without triggering overage penalties.

Hidden costs that don’t appear on the pricing page

Beyond credits, several hidden expenses can inflate your real cost of Apollo without you realizing it.

1. Deliverability management
Deliverability is one of the biggest silent cost drivers. Apollo’s email sequences are only as good as your domain reputation. 

Teams need to invest in:

• Domain warm-up tools and monitoring software.
  
  
  

• Proper SPF/DKIM/DMARC authentication.
  
  
  

• Dedicated sending domains to prevent blacklisting.
  
  
  

Even a small dip in deliverability — say, landing 20% more emails in spam — can translate to thousands of dollars lost in opportunity cost.

2. Data quality and validation

Every bounced email or invalid phone number wastes credits and lowers trust in your data. 

Smart teams add a validation layer before revealing contacts or exporting data. It’s an extra tool and small expense, but it saves far more in wasted credits and ensures your outreach doesn’t damage your sender score.

3. Operational inefficiencies

Apollo’s CRM integration is decent but not deep enough for fast-scaling teams. Sales reps often have to manually log interactions, clean duplicates, or update lead statuses — work that doesn’t generate revenue but still costs money in time and frustration.

When two reps reveal the same contact or reach out to a lead who’s already in the pipeline, you’re not just wasting credits — you’re creating noise in the CRM, reducing visibility, and increasing the risk of duplicate outreach.

Team-size economics: how TCO changes as you scale

The impact of Apollo’s pricing model shifts depending on team size and maturity:

• Small teams (1–3 reps): At this stage, every credit matters. The ROI comes from laser-focused targeting. 

Use Apollo mainly for ICP-aligned, high-quality searches, and always validate data before revealing. Avoid bulk exports — it’s a credit killer.

• Mid-sized teams (8–12 reps): The challenge becomes operational efficiency. Centralize enrichment and assign one operations owner to manage credits and integrations. Shared credit pools and usage dashboards help maintain consistency.
  
  
  

• Larger teams (20+ reps): Predictability is the main concern. These teams need quarterly forecasting, consumption alerts, and flexible redistribution of credits between pods (Outbound, ABM, or Regional). 

Implementing a credit governance policy can prevent overages and keep usage aligned with pipeline goals.

In all cases, success depends on one key rule: link credit spend to intent. Reveal contacts late, only when engagement signals are strong, and always prioritize leads tied to meaningful buying triggers (funding, hiring, product launches, etc.).

Measuring ROI: the metrics that really matter

Subscription costs mean nothing if they don’t generate results. To measure the true ROI of Apollo, teams should track:

• Cost per qualified conversation (total spend ÷ number of replies that become meetings).
  
  
  

• Meetings per 1,000 reveals (shows credit efficiency).
  
  
  

• Percentage of wasted credits (bounces, duplicates, irrelevant targets).
  
  
  

• Time-to-first-touch after a trigger event (faster = higher conversion).
  
  
  

• Pipeline generated per quarter versus credit consumption.
  
  
  

Teams that monitor these KPIs weekly often discover inefficiencies that can save 15–25% of their budget without reducing pipeline volume.

Smarter outreach and credit governance

Many Apollo users overspend simply because their workflows aren’t optimized. The way you design your sequences and manage multichannel outreach directly affects how fast you burn through credits.

For example, instead of running long, repetitive email sequences, design short, context-rich sequences triggered by real-time signals. A personalized message mentioning a recent funding round or hiring expansion is far more effective than a generic 8-step template.

Similarly, use LinkedIn outreach strategically before revealing mobile numbers. LinkedIn touches cost nothing and can warm up cold prospects before you spend credits on phone reveals. 

When engagement signals are strong — like multiple email opens or pricing-page visits — that’s when it makes sense to reveal and call.

These micro-adjustments can drastically cut credit waste while improving conversion rates. The goal isn’t to contact everyone; it’s to reach the right people, at the right time, through the right channel.

CRM integration: where money is saved or lost

A clean CRM connection can make or break your cost control. Every lead record should contain fields for reveal date, data source, and last activity outcome. This lets you trace exactly how credits are used and where conversions originate.

Without that visibility, duplication is inevitable — reps reveal the same lead twice, or outreach continues after a prospect already responded. 

Closing that loop improves forecasting, targeting, and future campaign prioritization.

It’s also important to sync Apollo data daily to ensure new replies, unsubscribes, and bounces reflect in the CRM. A stale sync not only wastes credits but risks violating compliance rules if you keep contacting someone who opted out.

A practical optimization checklist

Before upgrading to a higher Apollo tier, review these key points:

• Are you revealing contacts too early, before confirming fit or engagement?
  
  
  

• Do you validate data before consuming credits?
  
  
  

• Is your credit usage dashboard being checked weekly?
  
  
  

• Are you deduplicating Apollo and CRM records regularly?
  
  
  

• Is your cost per meeting trending up or down quarter over quarter?
  
  
  

If you’re seeing rising costs without better results, upgrading isn’t the solution — optimization is. Fix inefficiencies first, then scale.

The golden rule: predictability beats volume

The most successful sales teams in 2026 don’t just automate outreach — they operationalize efficiency. Apollo can deliver strong results, but only if you treat it as part of a disciplined, data-driven system, not a raw lead factory.

By aligning credit usage with buying intent, maintaining clean CRM syncs, and measuring success by meetings, not messages, companies can reclaim control of their budgets and often increase pipeline while spending 20% less per quarter.

In the end, sales productivity in 2026 isn’t just about speed or automation — it’s about predictability. The teams that master it don’t get caught off guard by overages or wasted spend. 

They know exactly where every dollar — and every credit — is going, and that clarity turns Apollo from a fluctuating expense into a reliable growth engine.

Which Apollo alternative is right for you?

Choosing the right sales engagement platform comes down to your team’s needs, your tech environment, and the goals you want to achieve.

While every solution offers its own strengths, the best fit depends on your current challenges and future plans.

Based on team size and growth stage

If you’re a small or fast-growing team, you’ll need a tool that balances ease of use, affordability, and strong multichannel capabilities within your broader startup ecosystem. Solutions like Mailshake or Mixmax are great for smaller groups looking to ramp up quickly without a steep learning curve.

For mid-sized or scaling teams, it’s important to have more automation, better analytics, and support for both email and social media.

Platforms like Salesloft and Reply.io offer advanced features that make it easier to manage higher outreach volume while still keeping a personal touch.

Larger enterprises often require robust administration, deep analytics, and strict security.

Tools like Groove and HubSpot Sales Hub are well-suited for organizations that need to coordinate large sales teams with comprehensive data oversight.

Based on tech stack compatibility

Integration with your existing systems is crucial. If your sales team is deeply invested in Salesforce, Groove stands out with its native Salesforce experience and seamless workflow sync.

For teams using Gmail or Google Workspace, Mixmax offers a familiar interface with powerful automation layered on top.

When you need to plug into a variety of CRMs, Salesloft, Outreach, and Reply.io deliver broad compatibility, allowing you to centralize all your sales activity.

The ability to connect multichannel outreach, email, LinkedInsocial media, phone, with your CRM ensures your data stays up-to-date, no matter where your sales happen.

Based on use case: outbound, ABM, SDR teams

The right platform should also fit your sales motion. For high-volume outbound or SDR teams, Close and Outreach provide the power to automate repetitive touchpoints across channels and scale outreach quickly.

If you run account-based marketing (ABM) campaigns or need deep personalization, Lemlist’s creative features and template library let you tailor every interaction.

Salesloft and HubSpot Sales Hub are strong choices for teams that want a unified pipeline from prospecting to deal management, especially when multichannel engagement is critical.

Ultimately, the best Apollo alternative is the one that matches your growth goals, integrates smoothly with your workflow, and supports a unified, multichannel approach to prospecting.

Prioritize platforms that let your sales reps focus on what matters, building relationships and closing deals, while automation and smart integrations handle the rest.

Challenges to consider when switching from Apollo

Transitioning to a new sales engagement platform can deliver big benefits, but it’s important to recognize and plan for the challenges that come with any change.

A smooth switch requires attention to both the technical and human aspects of the process.

1. Data transfer and campaign migration

Migrating your data is often the first major hurdle.

Moving contact lists, engagement history, and active sequences from Apollo to a new platform needs to be handled with care.
Any errors or omissions can result in lost information or disrupted outreach.

Many platforms offer migration tools, but it’s crucial to double-check data accuracy.

If you’re running ongoing campaigns, especially across email, social media, or phone, you’ll want to plan the timing of your migration so you don’t lose momentum or disrupt multichannel workflows.

2. Team onboarding and feature gaps

Adopting a new tool means getting your team up to speed quickly.

If the new platform uses a different workflow or offers features your reps haven’t seen before, there may be a learning curve.

Training is key, and access to quality support can make or break your rollout.

It’s also possible that not every feature from Apollo has a direct equivalent in your new platform.

Carefully review where there might be feature gaps, and prepare workarounds or adjustments to keep your outreach, especially across multiple channels, consistent and effective.

3. Integration setup and customization

Integration with your existing CRM and sales tools is critical for productivity.

Getting everything connected, syncing leads, activities, and campaign data can take time, especially if you have custom workflows or advanced reporting needs.

Before going live, test each integration thoroughly. Ensure your multichannel activities, whether by email, social media, or phone, flow smoothly into your CRM.

Customizing the new platform to match your sales process may require technical resources, but the payoff is a system tailored to your team’s exact needs.

3 Key trends reshaping the sales tech landscape

The world of sales technology is moving faster than ever, and new trends are transforming how teams prospect, engage, and win deals.

Understanding these shifts is essential for choosing the right tools and staying ahead of the competition.

1. Rise of AI agents and smart automation

AI agents and advanced automation are now at the center of high-performing sales teams.

Platforms are leveraging AI to automate repetitive tasks, qualify leads, and schedule follow-ups, saving teams hours every week.

Sales reps can focus more on building relationships and less on manual work, boosting productivity across the board.

Solutions powered by an AI sales agent allow reps to delegate routine tasks and focus on relationship-building.

2. Increasing demand for platform consolidation

Sales teams are tired of juggling multiple disconnected tools.

There’s a growing demand for platforms that bring together email, social media, phone, and data enrichment into one unified experience.

Centralizing prospecting workflows not only increases efficiency but also allows for smarter decision-making, with all the key data in one place.

3. Shift toward real-time enrichment and contextual data

Real-time data enrichment is quickly becoming a must-have.

Teams want platforms that can instantly fill in missing information, like emails, phone numbers, and job changes, so every outreach is timely and relevant.

The most innovative solutions use real-time data enrichment to personalize communication across every channel, from email to social media and beyond.

As these trends accelerate, the sales tools that deliver true multichannel automation, unified workflows, and AI-powered insights will set the pace for the future.

Teams embracing these innovations can expect to work smarter, respond faster, and consistently outperform the competition.

Why Enginy is a top Apollo alternative in 2026

When it comes to choosing a modern sales engagement platform, Enginy stands out for its ability to centralize and automate the entire prospecting process.

The platform is built with today’s fast-paced sales environment in mind, offering a suite of features that drive measurable results for ambitious teams.

Centralized prospecting with email, social media, calls and more

Traditionally, prospecting means bouncing between disconnected tools, one for email, another for social media, and something else for calls. Enginy changes this by bringing all your outreach channels into a single, unified flow.

Sales reps can run multichannel campaigns seamlessly, eliminating silos and ensuring every contact is reached on the right channel, at the right time.

Enriched lead data in real time from 30+ sources

One of the biggest challenges in sales is working with incomplete or outdated data. Enginy solves this with real-time data enrichment from over 30 integrated sources.

This means sales teams always have access to the most current emails, phone numbers, social media activity, and company details, empowering smarter, more relevant outreach.

Automate sequences, chatbot outreach and meeting booking

Automation is at the core of Enginy's value proposition.

Teams can set up complex, personalized sequences across email, social media, and calls, while intelligent chatbots handle initial conversations and even book meetings on the team’s behalf. For social proof and outcomes, explore their 11x reviews.

This not only saves countless hours but also ensures that leads move smoothly from first contact to booked appointment, with minimal manual intervention.

Built for speed, simplicity and scalable growth

Enginy is designed to get sales teams productive from day one.

The platform integrates easily with existing CRMs, requiring no overhaul of your current systems.

Its intuitive interface makes onboarding fast, while its scalable infrastructure ensures that whether you’re a small startup or a growing enterprise, your team can manage more leads and close more deals with less effort.

For organizations looking to break free from the constraints of fragmented workflows and limited automation, Enginy delivers a unified, multichannel approach, making it one of the strongest Apollo alternatives available today.

If your team needs multichannel sales automation with transparent CRM sales tools pricing, compare Apollo.io pricing against modern platforms that unify channels and remove credit overages, it’s often the difference between growth and grind.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

How much does Apollo cost per month?

Apollo pricing starts with a free tier, but most sales teams will need a paid plan to access advanced multichannel capabilities and higher data limits. Paid plans begin at about $49 per user per month, with higher tiers offering more features and volume. It’s crucial to factor in the extra cost of credits if your team needs to export more data, reveal phone numbers, or run larger campaigns.

What are the best Apollo alternatives for multichannel prospecting?

Top alternatives for multichannel outreach include Enginy, Outreach, Salesloft, Reply.io, and HubSpot Sales Hub. These platforms let you launch and track campaigns across email, LinkedIn, phone, and sometimes SMS, ensuring you reach leads on the channels that matter most.

Which tools offer similar features to Apollo at a lower price?

Platforms like Mailshake, Mixmax, and Lemlist deliver much of the same automation, contact management, and email outreach as Apollo, often with simpler and more transparent pricing. They’re strong choices for smaller teams or companies starting out with multichannel prospecting.

Do Apollo competitors offer CRM and LinkedIn integration?

Yes, most leading alternatives now offer strong integrations with major CRMs like Salesforce, HubSpot, and Pipedrive. LinkedIn integration for automated messaging, connection requests, and tracking is also common, making true multichannel workflows easier to manage.

Is it easy to switch from Apollo to another platform?

Switching is much easier today thanks to improved migration support and user onboarding from modern platforms. Plan your data migration and campaign setup in advance, and take advantage of the step-by-step guidance many tools provide. Ensuring seamless CRM integration is key for a smooth transition.

What’s the most scalable Apollo alternative for B2B teams?

For B2B sales teams focused on scale and automation, Enginy leads with unified, automated workflows for email, LinkedIn, and phone. Outreach and Salesloft are also top picks for larger organizations needing robust analytics and multichannel capabilities. Scalability comes from a platform that centralizes your channels and data, supporting growth every step of the way.